lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: concurrent VM subsystems
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote:

> Obviously I was not meaning that desktops have not to be stable, but
> they are not subjects to long uptimes, at less usually, so page aging
> is, how can I say in correct english?, dealing with different
> conditions...

Interestingly, of all the people saying that we should have
different VM systems for different situations, NOBODY has
managed to point out what specific things should be different.

The current situation of having 2 competing VMs seems to work
out nicely, though. Especially when ideas get merged all the
time.

regards,

Rik
--
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:11    [W:0.069 / U:1.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site