[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.10/Preemt STOP bug
On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 20:58, Justin A wrote:
> It seems there is a bug in 2.4.10 or the preemptable patch that causes the STOP
> signal to not work right 19 times out of 20 or so.
> This is most easily seen by running 'seq 1 100000' in a terminal and pressing
> control Z or using kill -STOP the proccess stops, but the parent process never
> comes back, kill -CONT has to be used in order to get the proccess back.
> CPU usage my be a factor in this, yes(1) backgrounds correctly more often then
> seq does.
> There are no problems with fg/CONT.

The problem is with the preemptible kernel patch...

You need to be using a recent patch, this bug was fixed awhile back in
an explicit patch (patch-rml-2.4.xx-preempt-ptrace-signal-fix-1).

It was merged into the 2.4.10 patch with revision 5, and it is in all
newer patches.

You can get patches for 2.4.10, 2.4.11-pre2, and 2.4.10-ac3 (soon -ac4)

They all fix this problem.

Robert M. Love
rml at
rml at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.020 / U:2.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site