Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andreas Dilger <> | Date | Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:46:17 -0600 | Subject | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| |
On Oct 02, 2001 19:03 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > Jamal mentioned some about the polling efforts for Linux. I can give some > experimental data here with GIGE. Motivation, implantation etc is in paper > to presented at USENIX Oakland.
How do you determine the polling rate? I take it that this is a different patch than Ingo's?
> Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR Flags > eth0 1500 0 4031309 7803725 7803725 5968699 22 0 0 0 BRU > eth1 1500 0 18 0 0 0 4031305 0 0 0 BRU > > The RX-ERR, RX-DRP are bugs from the e1000 driver. Anyway we getting 40% of > packet storm routed. With a estimated throughput is about 350.000 p/s
Are you sure they are "bugs" and not dropped packets? It seems to me that RX-ERR == RX-DRP, which would seem to me that the receive buffers are full on the card and are not being emptied quickly enough (or maybe that is indicated by RX-OVR...) I don't know whether it is _possible_ to empty the buffers quickly enough, I suppose CPU usage info would also shed some light on that.
Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto, \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |