lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:08:25 -0700, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:28:34AM +0000, sayamindu dasgupta wrote:
>> Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>>
>> >Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>We prefer to test a lot before releasing, and the one time I
>> >>skipped that step was for 2.4.10, and it was the one which is
>> >>broken. Sigh.
>> >>
>> >
>> >How broken ? I ask because I'm worried since I use it. Or
>> >it's just the compilation problem with CONFIG_BUFFER_DEBUG
>> >and nothing serious ?
>> >
>> >PS: I don't see any other reports on ext3-users.
>>
>> hello
>> i've been using it for a few weeks and i don't get any probs
>> cheers
>> Sayamindu
>
>I don't think so...
>
>2.4.10-pre11 was only released ~1 week ago...
>
Wasn't there a big deal about having a common journalling service
before other journalling systems jumped into the pool?

john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.039 / U:18.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site