Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Tony Hoyle) | Subject | Re: Input on the Non-GPL Modules | Date | Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:08:13 GMT |
| |
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:36:58 +0000 (UTC), Jan Niehusmann <jan@gondor.com> wrote:
>What prevents the author of a non-GPL module who needs access to a >GPL-only symbol from writing a small GPLed module which imports the >GPL-only symbol (this is allowed, because the small module is GPL), >and exports a basically identical symbol without the GPL-only >restriction? > >Then he could use this new symbol from his non-GPL module.
This is still a GPL violation, as the small module couldn't then be linked with the proprietary module. Most companies aren't prepared to get into the legally murky ground that that sort of thing entails.
Tony
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |