lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: Kernel performance in reference to 2.4.5pre1
Date
I'll put this on my priority list to look into.  When I get the numbers,
I'll squeak again.

Thanks,
Cary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@zip.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:34 PM
> To: DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)
> Cc: Kernel Mailing List (E-mail); HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
> Subject: Re: Kernel performance in reference to 2.4.5pre1
>
>
> "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" wrote:
> >
> > 2.4.5pre1 is the base for comparison,
> >
> > [ figures showing that more recent kernels suck ]
> >
>
> SFS is a rather specialised workload, and synchronous NFS exports
> are not a thing which gets a lot of attention. It could be one
> small, hitherto unnoticed change which caused this performance
> regression. And it appears that the change occurred between 2.4.5
> and 2.4.7.
>
> We don't know whether this slowdown is caused by changes in the VM,
> the filesystem, the block device layer, nfsd or networking.
> For example,
> ksoftirqd was introduced between 2.4.5 and 2.4.7. Could it be that?
>
> For all these reasons it would be really helpful if you could
> go back and test the 2.4.6-preX and 2.4.7-preX kernels (binary search)
> and tell us if there was a particular release which caused
> this decrease in
> throughput.
>
> If it can be pinned down to a particular patch then there's a good
> chance that it can be fixed.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.165 / U:2.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site