Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: VM | Date | Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:08:40 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Why is the simple vm system still in place on the linus tree? I would think > the smart vm system in the ac tree would be better suited to .. oh.. say .. > everything. (The potential for less swapping is _always better_)
I've not reached any final conclusions on the VM - there are things that Rik's VM shows up that look like the VM algorithm is right but it triggers other stuff, and there are a couple of hackish bits left in still.
Smart is often good - especially given how slow disk seeks are. But smart is not always best for any algorithm.
Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |