[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] "Text file busy" when overwriting libraries
> Just to reiterate I see this as a solution to two problems
> 1) It adds an additional safety check that shared libraries won't
> mutate under you.

Which prevents a user with rights doing so deliberately.

> 2) It allows user space access to the security policy information
> regarding executables. Allowing to refust to
> execute binaries, and shared libaries on a filesystem mounted
> noexec.

Which is mostly useless anyway since anyone can write an ld-linux that
doesn't check providing the binary is readable. noexec is basically a weird
ancient unixism that is usless.

> My biggest unresolved issue is which numbers to choose for O_EXEC on
> every platform. As the DENYWRITE code is cleaner in open than in mmap.

And the fact that open has side effects.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.064 / U:2.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site