Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:49:27 -0400 | From | Patrick McFarland <> | Subject | Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4 |
| |
Well, I dont actually need anything thats provided in 2.4 thats not provided in 2.2. I tend to use standard hardware. Would 2.2 be a better choice?
On 13-Oct-2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hmm, it seems that I didnt realize I had to cc that to the list, because I = > > belive this is something that should be on the list. > > > > Anyhow, exactly how much tweeking did you do, and isnt the ac tree suppost = > > to be unstable? > > The -ac patches vary in stability. The release announcement for each one is > intended to be a guide to how stable I expect it to be. >
-- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |