[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4
Well, I dont actually need anything thats provided in 2.4 thats not provided in 2.2. I tend to use standard hardware. Would 2.2 be a better choice?

On 13-Oct-2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hmm, it seems that I didnt realize I had to cc that to the list, because I =
> > belive this is something that should be on the list.
> >
> > Anyhow, exactly how much tweeking did you do, and isnt the ac tree suppost =
> > to be unstable?
> The -ac patches vary in stability. The release announcement for each one is
> intended to be a guide to how stable I expect it to be.

Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland ||
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.031 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site