Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:33:01 -0400 | From | Patrick McFarland <> | Subject | Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4 |
| |
Hmm, it seems that I didnt realize I had to cc that to the list, because I belive this is something that should be on the list.
Anyhow, exactly how much tweeking did you do, and isnt the ac tree suppost to be unstable?
On 13-Oct-2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Now as of the tuning problem, that seems to be deep magic to me. How would = > > one tune 2.4 for a p133 with 16 megs of memory? Or should I just give up an= > > d try to tune 2.2? > > I've been running 2.4.12-ac1 happily on both 20Mb and 32Mb boxes. The > performance of the kernel has been good. Indeed the tuning work I had to do > on the 20Mb PC110 has been userspace. > > Alan >
-- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |