Messages in this thread |  | | From | Tim Hockin <> | Subject | Re: cpus_allowed | Date | Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT) |
| |
> Most of the CPU affinity patches you see were written before > cpus_allowed. They go through all sorts of trouble to do what the OS > now does on its own. If you want to change CPU affinity then you just > need a patch that adds a syscall or proc interface for setting the > cpus_allowed mask.
I'm still porting pset to 2.4. It is more robust than cpus_allowed and does more. My plan is to do away with cpus_allowed altogether, and just provide a compat with pset, but if enough stuff uses cpus_allowed, perhaps I'll have to leave it..
http://www.hockin.org/~thockin/pset
2.4.x patch not up yet - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |