Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4 | Date | Sat, 13 Oct 2001 18:16:00 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Now, the great kernel hacker, ac, said that 2.2 is better at vm in low memo= > ry situations than 2.4 is. Why is this? Why hasnt someone fixed the 2.4 cod= > e?
Actually they have on thw whole. However VM tuning is a hard problem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |