lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists
Date
>On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> In short, RCU seems to be a case of "hey, that's cool", but it's a
>> solution in search of a problem so severe that it is worth it.
>
>Oh, and before people start telling me that RCU was successfully used in
>AIX/projectX/xxxx/etc, you have to realize that I don't give a rats *ss
>about the fact that there are OS's out there that are "more scalable".

I understand and agree: RCU must prove itself -in- -Linux-.

>The last time I looked, Solaris and AIX and all the rest of the "scalable"
>systems were absolute pigs on smaller hardware, and the "scalability" in
>them often translates into "we scale linearly to many CPU's by being
>really bad even on one".

Again understood and agreed. Simplicity and single-CPU performance are
at least as important as scalability. Although I believe that RCU can
be an important part of all three in some situations, this belief is
clearly in need of more proof.

Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.089 / U:4.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site