[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick McFarland" <>
To: "Rik van Riel" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4

>Also, I'd like to say about the documentation...
>Currently, these files are in /proc/sys/vm:
>- bdflush
>- buffermem
>- freepages
>- kswapd
>- overcommit_memory
>- page-cluster
>- pagecache
>- pagetable_cache
>but a simple ls of /proc/sys/vm reports:
>bdflush kswapd overcommit_memory page-cluster pagetable_cache
>Shouldnt the documentation be updated, seeing for the fact it was written
in the 2.2.10 days?

I must be confused.. What kernel are you running?
This is on 2.4.8-ac9:
[root@aeon /root]# ls /proc/sys/vm
bdflush freepages max_map_count min-readahead pagecache
buffermem kswapd max-readahead overcommit_memory page-cluster

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.074 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site