lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables
Martin Wilck writes:
> Richard,
>
> > You've put the devfs_unregister_slave() inside an #ifdef. Yuk! It
> > shouldn't be conditional.
>
> I did that because I didn't want to pollute your code. The function
> was only needed for the UUID patch.
>
> > And I'm not really sure that I like this
> > function in the first place, but that's not something I want to get
> > into right now.
>
> I did not see a possibility to cleanly remove a slave that was
> registered before. Did I oversee something? Do you thing that
> functionality is superfluous?

The whole slave mechanism is a hack, created because of the badly
structured genhd layer. It's a convenience for lazy programmers (like
me, when I was hacking the genhd layer:-). I'd prefer to see it used
very sparingly.

Regards,

Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.076 / U:2.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site