[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Modutils 2.5 change, start running this command now
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 06:04:20 -0400, 
Benjamin LaHaise <> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:45:58PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>> In current modutils, a module that does not export symbols and does not
>> say EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS will default to exporting all symbols. This is a
>> hangover from kernel 2.0 and will be removed when modutils 2.5 appears,
>> shortly after the kernel 2.5 branch is created.
>> Starting with modutils 2.5, modules must explicitly say what their
>> intention is for symbols. That will break a lot of existing modules.
>Isn't EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS the default case for 99.44% of modules? It seems
>to me that the lameness incurred in adding an EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS line to
>each and every driver that one writes is a pointless additional hoop to
>jump through. I'd rather break the modules that are relying on behaviour
>that was deprecated several *years* ago than go through another make-work

I was going to do it that way. The problem is that it gives no
indication if the module has been checked or not. Adding
EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS says that somebody has reviewed the module and
decided that exporting no symbols is the correct behaviour. It is the
difference between no maintainer and a maintained module.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.057 / U:1.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site