[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which kernel (Linus or ac)?
> Of course, you can get most of the IDE chipset support, fs support
> 3.5, ext3) and LFS support as patches for 2.2:

Have used this and has worked great on the machines I've had to use it
on. Though I'm a bit leery about using it since I figure the generic
2.2.x.preX kernels get a lot more testing that those with this patch
installed. Also heard of problems using this patch on a VIA PIII SMP
system. :-( And just went I had been planning to use it on a dual PIII VIA
chipset board too.


I actually was going to start using this until I learned that 2.2.x
reiser patched kernels couldn't use reiserfs partitions made with 2.4.
:-( Ended up having to redo an entire system when a downgrade to 2.2.x
became imperitive. Also the 2.2.x reiser patch lacks the large file support
(on the reiser filesystems created under 2.2.x) and maybe other goodies and
I don't get that back easily by just switching kernels.


Might give this a try now that it appears to be release quality.


I'll look into this the next time > 2GB files support becomes needed on
a system. pre 2.4.x I had been using FreeBSD for such tasks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.060 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site