[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
"Paul E. McKenney" <> wrote:

> Here are two patches. The wmbdd patch has been modified to use
> the lighter-weight SPARC instruction, as suggested by Dave Miller.
> The rmbdd patch defines an rmbdd() primitive that is defined to be
> rmb() on Alpha and a nop on other architectures. I believe this
> rmbdd() primitive is what Richard is looking for.

Surely we don't need both? If rmbdd exists, any code needing wmbdd
is terminally broken?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.037 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site