Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac11 | From | Miles Lane <> | Date | 10 Oct 2001 23:52:48 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 20:30, Tom Rini wrote: > Hello. In updating the PPC defconfigs, I noticed that > drivers/usb/Config.in will ask questions on machines where CONFIG_PCI=n > but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y. The following puts all of the USB items > under the if [ "$CONFIG_USB" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_USB" = "m" ] check and > fixes some spacing bits.
Do we really still think USB deserves the Experimental label? I use it all the time and it seems about as solid as any of the other subsystems. I know drivers continue to evolve, get bugs fixed and new ones get added, but is that a good reason to mark all USB support experimental?
Just wondering what the criteria are,
Miles
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |