Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:34:21 +0200 | From | Stephan von Krawczynski <> | Subject | Re: Partitioning problems in 2.4.11 |
| |
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:59:03 -0400 (EDT) Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Christian Ullrich wrote: > > > a) -10-ac11, -10-ac12 and -12 with your patch all behave like -11. > > _Ouch_. So even bread()-based variant fails to read extended partition > table in some cases. > > Hmm... Just in case - what processor are you using?
Hi Alexander,
just a short comment: I got a host with PIII-500 and the same problem. A partition on primary IDE (single partition for whole drive) vanished during use of 2.4.10(SuSE 7.3)/11. System works flawlessly otherwise. It is booting from SCSI, ide was only data :-). It has 384 MB RAM.
Regards, Stephan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |