lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac11 parport_pc.c bugfix
The fact that (unsigned long)-1 and ~0U have different 
values on different arches isn't a problem.

What would be a problem is if (unsigned long)-1 were liable
to be given different values by different compilers, and
especially if (unsigned long)-1 were liable to be cast to
some number between 0 and 15. But I assume that the type
casting rules of C prohibit this---that (unsigned long)-1
is assured to be some very large positive integer. (Indeed,
the largest.) However I'm uncertain enough about this
assumption that I raise the present question about it.

Assuming that the assumption is correct [:)], the patch is fine
as it is and should go in.

BTW what problem is it you are having with PnP BIOS on your arch?
Can you refer me to a past thread title?

--
Thomas

____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.037 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site