Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:59:01 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Tainted Modules Help Notices |
| |
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:20:58 +0100, > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > >BSD-licensed modules shouldn't mark the kernel as tainted. If they do, > >that's surely a bug. > > Any license not listed in include/linux/module.h is not GPL compatible. > That list is currently (2.4.11) > > "GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or later] > "GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more] > "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or BSD license choice] > "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 or Mozilla license choice]
What the hell? BSD without advertisement clause had always been GPL-compatible.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |