Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 9 Oct 2001 23:00:07 -0700 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp |
| |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:34:41AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 01:24, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:15:25AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > > > > > Ahh, yes. Thank you for spotting this. include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has > > > two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them. I > > > guess you hit the conditional that used the other define... > > > > > > The attached patch fixes it. > > > > > > > Thank you. Will compile now... > > Let me know, I didn't test :) > > If it works I will merge it... >
Compilation success.
Will boot and run over the next couple days.
> > > I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest > > > -pre and -ac I patched. Since the patch itself is being updated, its a > > > pain to backport to older kernels. > > > > > > > No, I'm not asking for backport, just links to one version back just in case > > the latest patch has a bug much like this... > > > > I'd rather run one (working) version back than have to go to UP just to get > > preempt... Needless to say, I chose to keep smp. > > OK, then try editing the URL, I scp the patches in and don't ssh in and > actually clean the stuff up but every here and there. > > ie, change the ac10 to ac9 in the URL. >
Yep, thought of that, but didn't try it. I figured it would be better to report than to go silent...
Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |