Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:13:45 -0400 |
| |
On Wednesday 10 October 2001 09:02, BALBIR SINGH wrote: > Balbir Singh wrote: > > Rob Landley wrote: > >> Or long lived kernel threads from short lived login sessions. ... > Ooh! sorry this is a wrong approach to send SIGCHLD to the previous parent. > AFAIK, all shells send their children SIGHUP when the shell exits, but SSH > may have some special security consideration in waiting for all children to > exit, does anyone know? > > Balbir
The problem I mentioned above was the reason "reparent_to_init" was created in the first place. Here it is in the archive:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.0/0045.html
I.E. already fixed...
Google could probably find Jimmy Hoffa given half a chance... (If we could just figure out how to connect it up to maps.yahoo.com...)
Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |