[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion

> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:33:58PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > 1. Define an rmbdd() which is a no-op on all architectures except for
> > alpha, where it is an rmb. Richard can then have the job of
> > finding all the places where an rmbdd is needed, which sounds like
> > one of the smellier labors of Hercules to me. :)
> I don't think it's actually all that bad. There won't be all
> that many places that require the rmbdd, and they'll pretty
> much exactly correspond to the places in which you have to put
> wmb for all architectures anyway.

Just to make sure I understand... This rmbdd() would use IPIs to
get all the CPUs' caches synchronized, right? Or do you have some
other trick up your sleeve? ;-)

Thanx, Paul

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:3.315 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site