lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.11: problem with at1700
Luis Montgomery wrote:
>
> I try to compile 2.4.11 and find this error:
>
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS
> -include /usr/src/linux-2.4.11/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o
> at1700.o at1700.c
> at1700.c:475: conflicting types for `read_eeprom'
> at1700.c:161: previous declaration of `read_eeprom'
> make[2]: *** [at1700.o] Error 1
>

That's an easy one:

--- linux-2.4.11/drivers/net/at1700.c Tue Oct 9 21:31:38 2001
+++ linux-akpm/drivers/net/at1700.c Wed Oct 10 09:03:41 2001
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct net_local {
extern int at1700_probe(struct net_device *dev);

static int at1700_probe1(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr);
-static int read_eeprom(int ioaddr, int location);
+static int read_eeprom(long ioaddr, int location);
static int net_open(struct net_device *dev);
static int net_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
static void net_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs);
Incidentally, do you use at1700 much? Does it work OK?
There's an ancient patch at http://web.gnu.walfield.org/mail-archive/linux-kernel/2000-July/3897.html
which seems fairly significant, but it's rare hardware, and I don't
think there have been any bug reports.


-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.034 / U:2.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site