Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:18:25 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Tainted Modules Help Notices |
| |
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > kaos@ocs.com.au said: > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > > > BSD-licensed modules shouldn't mark the kernel as tainted. If they do, > > > that's surely a bug. > > > Any license not listed in include/linux/module.h is not GPL > > compatible. That list is currently (2.4.11) > > In the world I live in, the BSD licence without the advertising clause is > GPL compatible.
So is LGPL, for that matter. And yes, it _does_ make sense, especially for headers.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |