lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Tainted Modules Help Notices


On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:

>
> kaos@ocs.com.au said:
> > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > BSD-licensed modules shouldn't mark the kernel as tainted. If they do,
> > > that's surely a bug.
>
> > Any license not listed in include/linux/module.h is not GPL
> > compatible. That list is currently (2.4.11)
>
> In the world I live in, the BSD licence without the advertising clause is
> GPL compatible.

So is LGPL, for that matter. And yes, it _does_ make sense, especially
for headers.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.094 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site