Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 9 Oct 2001 22:24:03 -0700 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp |
| |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:15:25AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 00:46, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Fail 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp > > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+up-apic+up-ipapic > > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt > > Success 2.4.10-ac10 > > > > Robert, can you do a test compile for smp just in case? > > Ahh, yes. Thank you for spotting this. include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has > two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them. I > guess you hit the conditional that used the other define... > > The attached patch fixes it. >
Thank you. Will compile now...
> > Also, I couldn't find any links to old patches on your web site... > > [...] > > I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest > -pre and -ac I patched. Since the patch itself is being updated, its a > pain to backport to older kernels. >
No, I'm not asking for backport, just links to one version back just in case the latest patch has a bug much like this...
I'd rather run one (working) version back than have to go to UP just to get preempt... Needless to say, I chose to keep smp.
Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |