[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
    On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:15:25AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
    > On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 00:46, Mike Fedyk wrote:
    > > Fail 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
    > > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+up-apic+up-ipapic
    > > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt
    > > Success 2.4.10-ac10
    > >
    > > Robert, can you do a test compile for smp just in case?
    > Ahh, yes. Thank you for spotting this. include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has
    > two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them. I
    > guess you hit the conditional that used the other define...
    > The attached patch fixes it.

    Thank you. Will compile now...

    > > Also, I couldn't find any links to old patches on your web site...
    > > [...]
    > I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest
    > -pre and -ac I patched. Since the patch itself is being updated, its a
    > pain to backport to older kernels.

    No, I'm not asking for backport, just links to one version back just in case
    the latest patch has a bug much like this...

    I'd rather run one (working) version back than have to go to UP just to get
    preempt... Needless to say, I chose to keep smp.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:2.296 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site