lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:15:25AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 00:46, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Fail 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp
> > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+up-apic+up-ipapic
> > Success 2.4.10-ac10+preempt
> > Success 2.4.10-ac10
> >
> > Robert, can you do a test compile for smp just in case?
>
> Ahh, yes. Thank you for spotting this. include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has
> two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them. I
> guess you hit the conditional that used the other define...
>
> The attached patch fixes it.
>

Thank you. Will compile now...

> > Also, I couldn't find any links to old patches on your web site...
> > [...]
>
> I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest
> -pre and -ac I patched. Since the patch itself is being updated, its a
> pain to backport to older kernels.
>

No, I'm not asking for backport, just links to one version back just in case
the latest patch has a bug much like this...

I'd rather run one (working) version back than have to go to UP just to get
preempt... Needless to say, I chose to keep smp.

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:0.065 / U:27.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site