[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kernel changes
    On 28 Sep 2001 23:33:39 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > The answer is to treat all linus/ac/aa/... kernels as development
    > > kernels. Don't treat anything as stable until it's been through
    > > a real QA cycle. I've heard Suse, RedHat and the like don't do a
    > > bad job at this.
    > We try. If you want to QA your own kernel the cerberus test suite is
    > publically available - and indeed the VA guys are to thank for its origins.
    > Alan

    For Linux QA/Testing, you may also want to check out the Linux Test
    Project. We just had a new release that added about 400 new testcases
    which is way up from what we had before. We also have descriptions for
    all the tests now too.

    -Paul Larson

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.022 / U:4.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site