[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel changes
On 28 Sep 2001 23:33:39 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The answer is to treat all linus/ac/aa/... kernels as development
> > kernels. Don't treat anything as stable until it's been through
> > a real QA cycle. I've heard Suse, RedHat and the like don't do a
> > bad job at this.
> We try. If you want to QA your own kernel the cerberus test suite is
> publically available - and indeed the VA guys are to thank for its origins.
> Alan

For Linux QA/Testing, you may also want to check out the Linux Test
Project. We just had a new release that added about 400 new testcases
which is way up from what we had before. We also have descriptions for
all the tests now too.

-Paul Larson

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.041 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site