Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:38:23 -0600 (CST) | From | Jesse Pollard <> |
| |
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote: > > > Not exactly valid, since a file could be created in that "pinned" directory > > after the rmdir... > > No, it couldn't (if you can show a testcase when it would - please do, you've > found a bug). Moreover, busy directories can be removed in 2.4 quite fine - > it's about pathname, not about the thing being your (or somebody else) pwd.
Apologies to all, foot-in-mouth disease....
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |