[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state)

On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > I put it into generic_file_write. That covers most fs's it seems. The jffs
> > > guys are going to switch to generic_file_write soon and the other fs's
> > > that dont are wacko ones I dont care about ;)
> >
> > Alan, we have to deal with get_block() failures anyway. -ENOSPC, -EDQUOT,
> > not to mention plain and simple -EIO. -EFBIG handling is not different.
> EFBIG is very different in several ways. To start with the get_block code
> doesnt have enough information to correctly implement the SUS specification
> rules.

Umm... Details, please? Are you talking about 2^32 or about fs layout limits?
The former may very well belong to VFS - no arguments here. The latter...
And yes, fs layout limits are visible - for ext2 they can be as low as 2^24

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.115 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site