lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:01:04AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
    > Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:13:08 +1300
    > From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
    >
    > OK, I'm a liar -- bind does handle this. Cool.
    >
    > Standard BSD allows it, what do you expect :-)
    >
    > This is good news, because it means there is a precedent for multiple
    > addresses on a single interface so we can kill the <ifname>:<n>
    > syntax in favor of the above which is cleaner of more accurately
    > represents what is happening.
    >
    > If this is really true, 2.5.x is an appropriate time to make
    > this, no sooner.

    I think it would be better to keep it. The ifa based alias interface
    emulation adds minor overhead (currently it's only a few lines of code,
    assuming we need named if addresses for other reasons too, which we do)
    and removing it it would break a lot of configuration scripts etc., for
    no really good gain.


    -Andi



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.032 / U:0.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site