[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Subtle MM bug
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> > AFAIK newer glibc = CVS glibc but the malloc() tune parameters work
> > via environment variables for the current stable ones as well,
> I'll arrange a binary linked against glibc2.2, and then your suggestion
> will hopefully do the trick. Thanks for your kind help!

OK, I now have a binary dynamically linked against /lib/,
(according to ldd), and that points to glibc-2.1.92. And I tried setting
the environment variables you suggested, I checked that they are set and
checked that they appear in /lib/ But the behaviour is
unchanged: MAGMA still hits this barrier at 830M (not 870M, that was a

I guess I conclude that either (1) MAGMA does not use libc's malloc
(checking on this, I doubt it) or (2) glibc-2.1.92 knows of these
variables but has not yet implemented the tuning (I'll try glibc-2.2) or
(3) this is not the problem.

I'll look at Andrea's hack as well. Thanks for everybody's help!

Cheers, Wayne

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.052 / U:5.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site