Messages in this thread |  | | From | Bernd Eckenfels <> | Subject | Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? | Date | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:19:53 +0100 |
| |
In article <20010105230950.B301@bug.ucw.cz> you wrote: > Also thing about cases where powerplant fails, or when electricity in > the house fails. I've seen places where electricity failed 5 times a > day, because someone put 10A fuse and we were using just about 2kW...
Especially evil is a power failure, and then a second failure while fsck is running...
So i hope Journaling FSs will have the power of normal FSs soon, so we can have them as a default for consumers. Otherwise:
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target6/lun0/part1 on / type ext2 (ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw) /dev/sda5 on /usr type ext2 (ro) /dev/sda6 on /var type ext2 (r,noexec) /dev/sda7 on /home type ext2 (rw,nosuid) /dev/scd0 on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro)
some read only filesystems :)
Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |