[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state)

On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:01:10PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I prefer SuS fpathconf(), pathconf() is just a wrapper to fpathconf();
> >
> > You can't implement it that way in the corner cases.
> I reread SuSv2 again and didn't found corner cases.
> Do you mean FIFO/pipe stuff ? I can't see the problem in this area.
> In which case is an emulation of pathconf by fpathconf impossible ?

Damnit, symlinks for one thing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.105 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site