[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Subtle MM bug
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:

> AFAIK newer glibc = CVS glibc but the malloc() tune parameters work
> via environment variables for the current stable ones as well, e.g. to
> overcome the above "out of memory" one could do,
> % export MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=1000000
> % magma

As I just mentioned, I haven't been able to test this yet due to my
current binary being linked against an older libc with doesn't seem to
have these parameters. But here's one other data point, I just thought
I'd ask if this jives with your theory: if I configure the linux kernel
to be able to use 2GB of RAM, then the 870MB limit becomes much lower, to

Cheers, Wayne

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.408 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site