Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 03:50:34 -0800 | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:40:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@tanstaafl.de>
As long as "man ip" on my machines returns "ip(7) - ip - Linux IPv4 protocol implementation", using "ip" exclusively instead of ifconfig and route is IMHO not an option for anyone else than bleeding edge hackers and linux gurus.
As long as "man printf" gives me that damn shell command manpage, I will not use printf in my C applications. :-)))) Yes, I do understand, "ip" needs some more documentation perhaps.
Nobody has suggested getting rid of ifconfig, rather we have suggested to implement it in terms of "ip" because, as you even mention, "ip" is powerful and can do everything ifconfig can do thus ifconfig can be implemented as a wrapper on top of "ip".
Nobody has suggested to use "ip" exclusively, you will not invoke "ip" with the suggestion I am making. Ifconfig indirectly will, but you won't even notice nor should you care. They will be packaged together, so even that won't be an issue.
Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |