[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: xfs mount opts (was: More better in mount(2))

On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Subject: Re: More better in mount(2)
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > ...
> > > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
> > > strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and read the
> > > 'Bugs' section.)
> > >
> > > It would be worth thinking about how to do this better.
> >
> > hmm ... can't claim I wrote this code, just looked at it.
> > are you saying the kernel strtok is horribly broken or just
> > the way its being used here? (and why?)
> >From the man page:
> ...

yup, I did see that. I've gone through the code and I can't
see anything wrong with it (tell me if I've missed something).
If the problem is simply that its using strtok, then this must
just be a perceived problem rather than an actual problem (the
data is copied, and noone uses it other than the parsing code,

>From a look through how the other filesystems do this, it
seems most use strtok (including ext2).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.032 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site