Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 06 Jan 2001 21:14:38 -0500 | From | "David C. Davies" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10) |
| |
<html><head></head><body>All,<br> <br> Please reply to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:daviesrallis@mediaone.net">daviesrallis@mediaone.net</a> rather than this email account.<br> <br> Regards,<br> <br> Dave<br> ------------------------------------<br> <br> Jeff Garzik wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:3A0350EC.8B1A3B4D@mandrakesoft.com"><pre wrap="">Andi Kleen wrote:<br></pre> <blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because<br>it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its<br>always MTU sized skbuffs.<br></pre></blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----><br>One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports<br>that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.<br><br> Jeff<br><br><br></pre> </blockquote> <br> </body></html> |  |