[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> This is totally offtopic. We were _not_ talking about other
> algorithms. We were _only_ talking about _when_ the 1 bit of
> aging I introduced with my algorithm improves performance at
> max. My answer is that the max performance improvement happens
> when there's the _highest_ VFS load in background and you
> disagreed. Everything else has nothing to do with this our
> previous discussion so your above reply partly still doesn't
> make sense to me.

Not only did I disagree, I also explained you why it
doesn't work the way you envision.

Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets
close this thread.


Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.071 / U:4.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site