Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:59:49 -0200 (BRDT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement |
| |
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> This is totally offtopic. We were _not_ talking about other > algorithms. We were _only_ talking about _when_ the 1 bit of > aging I introduced with my algorithm improves performance at > max. My answer is that the max performance improvement happens > when there's the _highest_ VFS load in background and you > disagreed. Everything else has nothing to do with this our > previous discussion so your above reply partly still doesn't > make sense to me.
Not only did I disagree, I also explained you why it doesn't work the way you envision.
Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets close this thread.
EOT,
Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |