[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?
On  4 Jan, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> A mobile-phone that runs out of battery power will also lose all the
> phone numbers you have stored, etc. The same is true for most all
> embedded systems that save data.

In your world maybe. I would be quite pissed if my mobile phones lost
the stored numbers every time they run out of power. Nearly all embedded
devices nowadays keep their settings without power; be it a satellite
receiver, a PBX, a fax machine or a coffee brewer.

> This means that the data-base
> software has to roll-back and redo the temporarily-lost updates
> when it restarts. It uses the journal to accomplish this. As
> N-seconds gets smaller, the overhead necessary to maintain data
> consistency gets greater, so there are trade-offs.

And depending on the application they may really be worth it.

> A journaling file-system also needs some number to show the
> order of operations so that roll-backs and restarts work.
> Unfortunately, the systems that I have seen all use time for
> the number! You don't want time to reconstruct 'order'. You
> need a number that represents 'order'. Time is not your friend.

Since the metadata has to be sync anyway what about using a
normal transaction counter?



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.170 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site