[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> > > > Your comparing actual security with stack guarding? Stack guarding mearly
> > > > makes the attack diffrent.. rootkits are already available to defeat it.
> > > url?
> > Ugh do you have any idea how hard it is to find 2 year old exploits?
> > Heres the best I could find on short notice:
> >
> >
> You said there were rootkits specifically targetting stackguard.
> These URLs simply describe attacks on stackguard, where are the
> stackguard rootkits?

I'll correct myself then: there were non exec stack patches. Keep in
mind part of the problem is that some compilors actually use that feature
look up "trampolines" for more info.

Also I was in error to refer to it as stack guarding.. Stack guard is a
compilor. I acually use libsafe it's preferable for 2 reasons.
1 It's entirely userspace and it works fine.
2 If someone manages to render it useless I'll simply uninstall it.


PS Although personally I think linux reoutation is most harmed by distribs
who insists on installing software with bad security records. But that's
not relevent to linux-kernel.

Gerhard Mack

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.070 / U:1.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site