lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Dri-devel] DRM patch for Linux 2.4.0-prerelease
Rik,

It looks like this patch goes further than syncing with xfree 4.0.2, but syncs
with the dri trunk instead. There has been a version bump in the mga drm
module on the dri trunk to add a 'blit' ioctl. XFree 4.0.2 will barf on this.

As a broader question: All our version checking (in client drivers and DDX
drivers) check

found major == expected major
found minor == expected minor
found patch >= expected patch

and if they don't receive this, they refuse to play.

As I understood it, the major number is bumped on backwards-incompatible
changes, the minor number on backwards-compatible changes and the patch on all
other changes, though in practise never.

Thus, wouldn't the appropriate test be:

found major == expected major
found minor >= expected minor
(no test on patch)

This seems to match the semantics of the 3 numbers better?

Keith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.039 / U:3.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site