lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
> And one more point for the Janitor's list:
> Get rid of superflous irqsave()/irqrestore()'s - in 90% of the cases
> either spin_lock_irq() or spin_lock() is sufficient. That's both faster
> and better readable.

Expect me to drop any submissions that do this. I'd rather take the two
clock hit in most cases because the effect of spin_lock_irq() being used
and people then changing which functions call each other and producing
impossible to debug irq mishandling cases is unacceptable.

The original Linux network code did this with sti() not save/restore flags.
I've been there before, I am not going to allow a rerun of that disaster for
a few cycles

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:16    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans