[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:47:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Not really. Under very high VFS loads we'd just scan
> > through the list twice and free the entries anyway.
> You're obviously wrong.
> The higher was the load, the faster your working set was getting
> dropped from the dcache. (with the patch the working set will
> have a chance to remains in cache also with polluting going on
> instead,

> The example with only pollution in the cache doesn't make sense,

Ever heard of slocate / updatedb ?


Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.056 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site