[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4 and ipmasq modules
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:56:33AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:29:34PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, it's NAT'ing it OK. Are you sure you have a rule like the
> > following:
> > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > ?
> # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name

please move this discussion to the netfilter mailinglist.

> Hmm??
> I tried iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT and it did not fix DCC.

It seems like you didn't understand the very basics of netfilter/iptables.
Please read the available HOWTO's. the INPUT chain of the filter table is
in no way related to any packet on your NAT box.

Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte /
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M-
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.110 / U:5.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site