lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, V Ganesh wrote:

> now that we have inode->i_mapping->dirty_pages, what do we need
> inode->i_dirty_buffers for ? I understand the latter was added for the O_SYNC
> changes before dirty_pages came into the picture. but now both seem to be
> doing more or less the same thing.

inode->i_mapping->dirty_pages contains only mapped data pages of the
inode, not metadata.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.032 / U:2.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site