Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:44:23 +0000 (GMT) | | From | James Sutherland <> | | Subject | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| |
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sasi Peter wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > The only obvious use for it is file serving, and as high-performance > > file serving tends to end up as a kernel module in the end anyway (the > > only hold-out is samba, and that's been discussed too), "sendfile()" > > really is more a proof of concept than anything else. > > No plans for samba to use sendfile? Even better make it a tux-like module? > (that would enable Netware-Linux like performance with the standard > kernel... would be cool afterall ;)
AIUI, Jeff Merkey was working on loading "userspace" apps into the kernel to tackle this sort of problem generically. I don't know if he's tried it with Samba - the forking would probably be a problem...
James.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |