[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN?


Looking at the code for sock_no_fcntl() in net/core.c, I cannot specify
"0" as a value for F_SETOWN, unless I'm the superuser. I believe this to
be a bug, it stops de-registering an interest in SIGURG signals. Let me
know if you want a patch.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.062 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site