lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests
On Mon, Jan 22 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> Steven is a seeing a slowdown in his results, too.
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Steven Cole wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 18 January 2001 14:49, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > > Steven,
> > >
> > > The issue is the difference between pre4 and pre8.
> > >
> > > Could you please try pre4 and report results ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Ok, here are the results for 2.4.1-pre4, along with the original -pre8
> > results. There does appear to be a slowdown.
> >
> > 2.4.1-pre4
> > average: 9.77876 MB/sec
> >
> > Throughput 10.3677 MB/sec (NB=12.9597 MB/sec 103.677 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.61291 MB/sec (NB=12.0161 MB/sec 96.1291 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.92944 MB/sec (NB=12.4118 MB/sec 99.2944 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.20502 MB/sec (NB=11.5063 MB/sec 92.0502 MBit/sec)
> >
> > 2.4.1-pre8:
> > Average 9.25707 MB/sec
> >
> > Throughput 8.93444 MB/sec (NB=11.1681 MB/sec 89.3444 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.43609 MB/sec (NB=11.7951 MB/sec 94.3609 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.5075 MB/sec (NB=11.8844 MB/sec 95.075 MBit/sec)
> > Throughput 9.15026 MB/sec (NB=11.4378 MB/sec 91.5026 MBit/sec)
> >
> > This was done on a dual P-III, 256MB machine.

Stephen,

To rule out other factors, could you try 2.4.1-pre8 with
blk_started_io() and blk_finished_io() defined to nothing
in include/linux/blkdev.h? This will disable the max-locked-buffers
heuristic.

Also, are the numbers above consistent for repeated runs (with
boots in between)?

--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog